Capital allocation dashboard open on a desk in a DeFi protocol operations setting.
Protocols

Exchange and Custodian Integration Test Suite

Checklist and reference for exchanges and custodians to validate operational readiness against new Starknet client releases. Includes test vectors for transaction construction, signature verification, balance checking, and deposit address monitoring.
introduction
EXCHANGE AND CUSTODIAN TEST SUITE

Operational Readiness for Starknet Integration

A structured validation framework for exchanges and custodians to certify operational readiness against new Starknet client releases and protocol upgrades before production deployment.

The Exchange and Custodian Integration Test Suite provides a canonical checklist for validating core operational workflows—transaction construction, signature verification, balance reconciliation, and deposit address monitoring—against specific Starknet client releases. Integration teams use this suite to certify that their Starknet support remains correct and reliable after upgrading Pathfinder, Juno, or Papyrus nodes, or when adapting to new JSON-RPC specification versions. The suite is designed to catch regressions in fee estimation, nonce management, and event parsing that commonly break exchange pipelines during network upgrades.

Key validation vectors include constructing and broadcasting invoke and declare transactions with correct fee parameters derived from starknet_estimateFee, verifying secp256k1 and secp256r1 signature schemes against the native account abstraction model, and reconciling on-chain ERC-20 balance states with internal ledger entries using starknet_getStorageAt and event log filtering. Deposit monitoring tests validate that starknet_getEvents and WebSocket subscriptions reliably detect inbound transfers to generated deposit addresses without gaps or duplicates, a critical requirement for maintaining solvency in custodial operations. Each test case maps to a specific RPC method and client version, allowing teams to isolate failures to a particular software component.

Operators should execute this test suite against a staging environment running the target client version before promoting it to production. The suite complements the Pre-Release Testing and Staging Environments and Client Compatibility Matrix pages, which define the infrastructure setup and version alignment required for valid testing. Teams managing disaster recovery procedures should also validate that backup and restore operations do not corrupt the state required for balance reconciliation, as documented in the Backup, Restore, and Disaster Recovery Procedures page. Chainscore Labs can execute this integration test suite on behalf of exchange and custodian teams, providing a formal certification report that confirms operational readiness and identifies any compatibility gaps before a production upgrade.

EXCHANGE AND CUSTODIAN INTEGRATION TEST SUITE

Test Suite Quick Facts

Reference checklist for exchanges and custodians to validate operational readiness against new Starknet client releases and protocol upgrades before deploying to production.

AreaWhat changesWho is affectedAction

Transaction Construction

New Cairo VM versions or Blockifier releases may alter transaction serialization, fee estimation, or signature validation logic.

Exchanges, custodians, wallet teams

Run test vectors for transaction construction and signing against the target client version. Verify against canonical spec.

Deposit Address Monitoring

Full node RPC specification upgrades can change event log structures or block polling behavior for deposit detection.

Exchange operations teams, indexers

Validate deposit address monitoring flows using the starknet_getEvents and WebSocket subscription methods on the new client release.

Balance Checking

Changes in state commitment or RPC method responses may affect balance query accuracy for fee tokens and custom assets.

Custodians, accounting systems

Execute balance check test vectors for ETH, STRK, and major token standards. Compare results across client implementations.

Withdrawal Finality

Prover upgrades (Stone/Stwo) or L1 verification contract changes can alter the latency or proof settlement for L2-to-L1 withdrawals.

Bridge operators, exchanges processing withdrawals

Test withdrawal initiation, proof generation, and L1 finality monitoring against the target release on testnet.

RPC Method Compatibility

Deprecated methods or changed parameter types in new JSON-RPC specification versions break integration code.

RPC providers, backend engineering teams

Run integration test suite against all RPC methods used in production. Flag deprecated calls and validate replacement methods.

Client Upgrade Sequencing

Running incompatible full node versions during a network fork can cause state divergence or missed blocks.

Node operators, infrastructure teams

Verify client version compatibility against the Client Compatibility Matrix before upgrading. Test in staging environment first.

Fee Estimation Accuracy

Blockifier transaction executor changes can shift fee calculation logic, causing overpayment or transaction rejection.

Wallets, exchanges, DeFi protocols

Validate starknet_estimateFee responses against actual inclusion costs on testnet. Adjust fee buffers if necessary.

Disaster Recovery Readiness

New client releases may introduce database migration steps that affect backup and restore procedures.

SRE teams, custodians with strict RTOs

Execute backup, restore, and recovery tests against the new client version. Update disaster recovery runbooks.

technical-context
EXCHANGE AND CUSTODIAN INTEGRATION TEST SUITE

Integration Surface and Critical Paths

The operational interfaces and transaction flows that exchanges and custodians must validate to ensure reliable Starknet asset handling.

The integration surface for an exchange or custodian on Starknet extends far beyond a simple balance query. It encompasses the full lifecycle of a deposit, from monitoring for Transfer events on the correct token contract to verifying sufficient block confirmations against the canonical chain. The critical path for a withdrawal involves constructing a valid INVOKE transaction with accurate fee estimation via starknet_estimateFee, managing account nonce ordering to prevent sequence gaps, and submitting the transaction to a reliable RPC endpoint. Each of these touchpoints—event subscription, transaction simulation, fee market behavior, and RPC method compatibility—represents a potential failure mode that the integration test suite is designed to systematically validate against a specific Starknet client release.

A core operational risk lies in the mismatch between transaction simulation and on-chain execution. The test suite must verify that a transaction simulated via starknet_simulateTransactions produces the same fee consumption and state changes as one submitted to the live network. This is particularly sensitive to changes in the Blockifier transaction executor, where a new release could alter fee calculation logic or Cairo VM gas metering, causing simulated transactions to succeed while actual invocations fail. For custodians, the test vectors for signature verification are equally critical, ensuring that the signing logic for Starknet's native account abstraction—which differs fundamentally from Ethereum's ECDSA model—produces valid signatures that the sequencer will accept under the current protocol rules.

The operational checklist must also cover the monitoring surface: verifying that WebSocket subscriptions for new block headers and pending transactions remain stable under load, and that the event log filtering correctly identifies deposit transactions without false positives from non-standard token implementations. The integration test suite serves as a certification gate, allowing an operations team to assert that their Starknet integration is compatible with a target client version and JSON-RPC specification revision before deploying to production. Chainscore Labs can execute this test suite against a team's specific infrastructure, providing a certification report that validates transaction construction, signature handling, balance reconciliation, and deposit monitoring against the canonical Starknet protocol behavior.

INTEGRATION TEST SUITE IMPACT

Affected Teams and Systems

Exchange and Custodian Impact

Exchanges and custodians are the primary consumers of this test suite. The suite validates deposit address generation, balance checking, transaction construction, and signature verification against new Starknet client releases.

Key validation areas:

  • Deposit address monitoring and credit workflows
  • Withdrawal transaction construction and fee estimation
  • STRK and ERC-20 token balance queries
  • Account abstraction signature verification
  • Nonce management and transaction ordering

Teams should integrate this test suite into their pre-production staging environment before deploying new client versions. Failures in signature verification or fee estimation can result in stuck withdrawals or incorrect balance reporting.

Chainscore can execute the full integration test suite against your exchange infrastructure and provide a certification report confirming operational readiness for specific Starknet client versions.

implementation-impact
INTEGRATION VALIDATION SCOPE

Test Suite Modules

Core test modules that exchanges and custodians must execute to certify operational readiness against new Starknet client releases and protocol upgrades.

01

Transaction Construction and Submission

Validates correct construction of INVOKE, DECLARE, and DEPLOY_ACCOUNT transactions against the latest Starknet JSON-RPC specification. Tests include fee estimation accuracy using starknet_estimateFee, nonce ordering under concurrent submission, and signature generation for native account abstraction wallets. Exchanges must verify that their transaction construction pipeline produces valid calldata for all supported token standards and that fee estimation correctly accounts for L1 data gas costs. Chainscore can audit transaction construction logic and validate submission behavior against production sequencer endpoints.

02

Signature Verification and Key Management

Covers Starknet's native account abstraction signature schemes, including validation of secp256k1, secp256r1, and Ed25519 signers. Tests verify that exchange signing infrastructure correctly handles the full transaction hash computation, including the chain ID prefix and fee token binding. Custodians must validate that their HSM and MPC signing configurations produce signatures accepted by the sequencer and that signature replay protection functions correctly across network upgrades. Chainscore can review key management architectures and validate signature verification pipelines against canonical Starknet signer implementations.

03

Balance Checking and State Reconciliation

Validates accurate balance queries for ETH, STRK, and ERC-20 tokens using starknet_call against the fee token and ERC-20 contract addresses. Tests include reconciliation between exchange internal ledgers and on-chain state, handling of pending balance changes during block production, and correct interpretation of token decimal values. Custodians must verify that their balance monitoring detects unexpected state changes and that reconciliation processes handle reorgs correctly. Chainscore can design reconciliation test scenarios and validate balance monitoring accuracy against full node state.

04

Deposit Address Monitoring and Event Streaming

Tests the reliability of deposit detection using Starknet's WebSocket subscriptions and event log polling via starknet_getEvents. Validates correct handling of deposit address derivation, event log parsing for Transfer events, and confirmation depth logic for finality. Exchanges must verify that their event streaming infrastructure handles reconnection gracefully, processes historical events during catch-up, and correctly identifies deposits to unique user addresses. Chainscore can assess event streaming reliability and recommend resilient subscription architectures for production deposit monitoring.

05

Withdrawal Flow and L1 Finality Verification

Validates the end-to-end withdrawal flow from Starknet L2 to Ethereum L1, including correct message construction, proof generation timing, and L1 transaction submission. Tests verify that custodians correctly monitor the Starknet state proof verification on L1 and confirm withdrawal finality only after the fact registry records the proven state. Exchanges must test withdrawal scenarios under network congestion and verify that their L1 gas estimation accounts for proof verification costs. Chainscore can audit withdrawal pipelines and validate L1 finality monitoring against the GpsStatementVerifier contract.

06

Client Upgrade Compatibility and Regression Testing

Runs the full integration test suite against pre-release versions of Pathfinder, Juno, and Papyrus on Starknet testnets before mainnet activation. Validates that existing transaction construction, signature verification, and balance checking logic remains correct across client upgrades. Exchanges must execute regression tests against the client compatibility matrix and verify that their RPC provider failover configurations handle client-specific behavioral differences. Chainscore can design pre-release test plans and provide certification reports confirming operational readiness for new client versions.

EXCHANGE AND CUSTODIAN TEST SUITE

Integration Risk Matrix

Operational risk areas for exchanges and custodians validating Starknet client releases. Use this matrix to prioritize testing efforts and identify integration points that require certification before production deployment.

AreaWhat changesWho is affectedAction

Transaction construction

Blockifier updates may alter fee calculation, nonce handling, or transaction validation rules

Exchange deposit/withdrawal engines, wallet signing logic

Run test vectors for transaction serialization, signature verification, and fee estimation against new Blockifier releases

Balance checking

RPC method response format changes or state access patterns in new client versions

Reconciliation systems, custody reporting, deposit monitoring

Validate starknet_call and balance query responses match expected formats across Pathfinder, Juno, and Papyrus releases

Deposit address monitoring

Account model or address derivation changes in Cairo upgrades or SNIP standards

Deposit address generation, inbound transaction scanners

Verify address derivation paths produce correct Starknet addresses against new protocol versions

Signature verification

Account abstraction contract changes or new signature scheme support in protocol upgrades

Withdrawal authorization, multisig operations, key management

Test ECDSA and Stark curve signature verification against updated account contract implementations

RPC method compatibility

Deprecated methods, new required parameters, or changed response schemas in JSON-RPC spec versions

Transaction submission pipelines, event listeners, indexers

Audit all RPC method calls against the target specification version and remove deprecated method usage

Event log parsing

Event emission format changes or ABI updates in token standards or core contracts

Deposit detection, withdrawal confirmation, audit trails

Replay historical events through updated parsing logic and confirm no missed or malformed events

Fee estimation accuracy

L1 data gas cost changes, fee market parameter adjustments, or Blockifier fee logic updates

Withdrawal fee calculation, gas limit estimation, user-facing fee display

Compare starknet_estimateFee output against actual transaction costs on testnet before mainnet deployment

Client version compatibility

New Pathfinder, Juno, or Papyrus releases may introduce breaking database migrations or API changes

Full node operators, RPC endpoint providers

Verify client version against the compatibility matrix for the target protocol version and test migration paths

EXCHANGE AND CUSTODIAN INTEGRATION TEST SUITE

Pre-Production Certification Checklist

A structured validation checklist for exchanges and custodians to certify operational readiness against a new Starknet client release or network upgrade. Each item defines the verification step, its operational importance, and the specific signal or artifact that confirms readiness before deploying to production.

Validate that the integration can correctly construct, sign, and serialize all required transaction types (INVOKE, DECLARE, DEPLOY_ACCOUNT) against the target client version.

Why it matters: Incorrect transaction construction is the most common cause of failed deposits and withdrawals. A mismatch in the transaction hash calculation or signature scheme will result in silent failures or rejected transactions.

Readiness signal:

  • Generate test vectors for each transaction type on the target testnet.
  • Confirm that the computed transaction hash matches the hash returned by starknet_simulateTransactions and starknet_addInvokeTransaction.
  • Verify that signatures are valid according to the account contract's isValidSignature logic.
  • Artifact: A test report showing matching hashes and successful inclusion in a testnet block.
Chains We Build On

Looking to build on a specific blockchain?

We build smart contracts, DeFi applications, wallets, tokenization platforms, and blockchain infrastructure across the major ecosystems teams choose today. That includes Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, Avalanche, Solana, Sui, Aptos, Hedera, Stellar, and NEAR, with support for additional EVM and non-EVM networks based on your product requirements.

EVM ecosystems

  • Ethereum logo
    Ethereum
  • Arbitrum logo
    Arbitrum
  • Optimism logo
    Optimism
  • Polygon logo
    Polygon
  • Avalanche logo
    Avalanche
  • Cronos logo
    Cronos

Non-EVM ecosystems

  • Solana logo
    Solana
  • Sui logo
    Sui
  • Aptos logo
    Aptos
  • Hedera logo
    Hedera
  • Stellar logo
    Stellar
  • NEAR logo
    NEAR

Additional ecosystems

  • Polkadot logo
    Polkadot
  • Cosmos logo
    Cosmos
  • TON logo
    TON
  • Cardano logo
    Cardano
  • Algorand logo
    Algorand
  • Tempo logo
    Tempo

Also available for Base, appchains, custom EVM networks, and cross-chain product architecture.

INTEGRATION TEST SUITE FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions from exchange and custodian teams validating their Starknet integration against new client releases.

Validate transaction construction against the canonical starknet_simulateTransactions and starknet_estimateFee RPC methods. Key vectors include:

  • Invoke transactions: Verify correct nonce sequencing, fee token selection (ETH vs STRK), and calldata encoding for contract interactions.
  • Deploy account transactions: Validate signature construction for native account abstraction deployments.
  • Declare transactions: Confirm class hash computation and Cairo compiler version compatibility.
  • Fee estimation accuracy: Compare estimated fees against actual inclusion costs on testnet to detect Blockifier divergence.

Why it matters: Incorrect transaction construction leads to rejected submissions, stuck deposits, or unexpected fee consumption. The signal for readiness is consistent simulation results matching testnet sequencer behavior.

Trusted by Industry Leaders

Delivering blockchain solutions for 5+ years.

We have partnered with 50+ leading DeFi protocols, NFT ecosystems, and fintech innovators to build secure, scalable, and capital-efficient blockchain products.

Selected Partners & Clients

ChainVote logo
Reax logo
Sokail logo
Swapsicle logo
SyntheX logo
Tekika logo
Telos logo
Zexe logo
ChainVote logo
Reax logo
Sokail logo
Swapsicle logo
SyntheX logo
Tekika logo
Telos logo
Zexe logo
ChainVote logo
Reax logo
Sokail logo
Swapsicle logo
SyntheX logo
Tekika logo
Telos logo
Zexe logo
ChainVote logo
Reax logo
Sokail logo
Swapsicle logo
SyntheX logo
Tekika logo
Telos logo
Zexe logo
“I've been working with Chainscore Labs for last 3+ years, they've consistently delivered with strong ownership across multiple projects. The team is reliable and detail-oriented.”
L
Lee Erswell
CEO, Telos Foundation
how to get started

How to get started?

If you're looking for blockchain integration, ChainScore Labs has 5+ years of experience helping teams build and integrate exchanges, wallets, smart contracts, tokenization solutions, and protocol-connected products, we can help you choose the right path, integrate securely, and get to production faster. Our team consists of experienced blockchain developers and architects who can help you with your blockchain integration needs.

01

Exploration & Strategy

Define your product goals and choose the right blockchain architecture for your use case.

02

Architecture & Design

Design the smart contracts, tokenomics, and security parameters of your system.

03

Development & Integration

Build and integrate with wallets, oracles, and front-end dApps for a seamless experience.

04

Security & Launch

Comprehensive audits followed by a risk-managed mainnet deployment to protect your users.

Start a build

Need a blockchain engineering team?

Send the project context and we will respond with next steps, scope questions, and a practical path to delivery.